Stick Welding Chart: The Complete Electrode, Amperage & Settings Reference (2026)
Stick welding chart guide: amperage by rod diameter, E6010 vs E7018, polarity, positions, and troubleshooting tables for SMAW…
READ ARTICLE →Imagine you’re on a job site and grab what looks like the right stick electrode, only to end up with poor penetration, excessive spatter, or a weld that fails inspection. The difference between success and failure often comes down to understanding the small code printed on every electrode. That code is a roadmap to performance, strength, and usability.
Every stick electrode you pick up carries a short string of characters printed right on the flux: E7018, E6010, E6013. To a beginner it looks like inventory shorthand. To an experienced welder, inspector, or engineer, it’s a complete performance summary. That string is the electrode code, and understanding its meaning is the difference between running a sound, inspectable weld and burning in something that gets ground out the next morning.
So what does “electrode code meaning” actually refer to? In short, it’s the ability to read a welding electrode classification and instantly know what that rod is made of, how strong the deposited weld metal will be, which welding positions it can handle, what coating type it uses, and which currents it accepts. Once you can decode that, you no longer guess at rod selection. You read it.
Before standardized classifications existed, every manufacturer had its own naming conventions. A rod one company called “heavy duty” might be a light penetration rod from another. Engineers couldn’t write reliable specifications, inspectors couldn’t verify compliance, and field welders had no consistent way to substitute one product for another.
The American Welding Society solved this by publishing classification systems that standardize three things for every electrode: chemical composition, mechanical properties (chiefly tensile strength), and usability characteristics such as position and current type. For carbon steel shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) electrodes, the governing specification is AWS A5.1/A5.1M, which defines what an E6013 or E7018 must actually deliver in testing.
The practical effect is remarkable repeatability. An E7018 from one manufacturer must meet the same minimum tensile strength, toughness, and diffusible hydrogen limits as an E7018 from another. That consistency is what allows a welding procedure specification (WPS) to call for “E7018” without naming a brand, and what lets an inspector verify work against the structural requirements of AWS D1.1/D1.1M.
Quick Note: The code is not a brand name or a model number. It’s a performance specification. If two rods both say E7018, they must meet the same AWS requirements regardless of who manufactured them.
You don’t need to memorize the entire standard to start profiting from electrode codes. Two elements alone will change how you select rods:
Those two clues alone tell you whether a rod meets a job’s strength requirement. But the digits that follow tell you whether you can actually run it in the position the joint demands, on the power source you have, with the penetration profile the joint geometry requires.
Electrode selection failures rarely announce themselves immediately. They show up later as undercut, lack of fusion, hydrogen-induced cracking, or a tensile test coupon that fails at the lab. Each outcome means rework, delayed inspections, or worse, a repair on a structure already in service.
Consider how wide the practical differences are between common rods. E6010 is a deep-penetrating, fast-freeze rod that welders drag through root passes and open-root pipe joints, often paired with technique guidance from our pipe welding procedures guide. E7018 is a low-hydrogen, soft-arc rod favored for structural fillets and cap passes, where settings matter enough that we dedicate a full walkthrough to 3/32 E7018 amperage and polarity. Using one where the other belongs isn’t a minor inconvenience; it’s a procedure violation.
Codes also matter for safety and legal compliance. Structural welds, pressure piping, and seismic-rated connections are almost always governed by a specification that names an acceptable electrode classification. Welding outside that classification, whether through substitution or simple misreading, can fail inspection outright. That’s why code literacy is treated as a core professional skill alongside fundamentals like understanding electrode types, numbers, and polarity.
This article takes you through the entire classification system step by step. You’ll learn:
Short Note: If you’re new to stick welding, spend a few minutes with the basics first, such as whether stick welding is hard for beginners, before diving into classification details. The code makes far more sense once you’ve felt how differently two rods behave in the same joint.
Manufacturers back up these classifications with published technical data. Companies like Lincoln Electric and Hobart Brothers publish plain-language explanations of how the digits map to weld metal chemistry, shielding, and current requirements, which is exactly the corroboration you should look for when a rod’s box makes a claim that seems too good to be true.
By the end, a code like E7018 will stop being a label and start being a specification you can read at a glance: an arc-welding electrode, 70,000 psi minimum tensile strength, usable in all positions, with a specific coating type and current compatibility. That’s electrode code meaning in its purest form, and mastering it is the foundation everything else in this guide builds on.
Long before E7018 became shorthand for “strong, low hydrogen, all-position-ish rod,” welders bought electrodes by the box and hoped the manufacturer’s word held up. Shop drawings said “use a 70-k rod,” inspectors argued, and nobody could prove much of anything. The classification system changed that. Understanding where the codes came from is the fastest way to understand why they still matter on every job you work.
The story starts with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), which published early filler metal specifications in the A233 series during the first half of the 20th century. Those standards grouped covered welding electrodes by tensile strength ranges rather than precise values, and they described the deposited weld metal in plain language. It worked, but it was loose: different mills interpreted requirements differently, and buyers had no reliable way to compare one brand against another.
The American Welding Society took over the classification work and built something tighter. The carbon steel stick electrode specification AWS A5.1/A5.1M evolved directly out of those ASTM A233 documents and has been revised repeatedly for decades to track industry needs — new alloys, tighter hydrogen control, metric adoption, and modern test methods. Today’s A5.1 revision carries the year stamp on its cover, which is why you’ll see references to editions from 1990 through the current 2025 version. A standard that never changes becomes useless; AWS reissues A5.1 so the classification keeps matching what welding actually demands.
Quick Note: The digits in E7018 don’t describe a brand or a price point. They describe required, testable properties — so a box of E7018 from any compliant manufacturer must meet the same minimum tensile strength and testing criteria.
A single code speaks three different languages at once:
This cross-brand comparability is the whole point of the system. Lincoln Electric’s AWS classification overview puts it plainly: the classification guarantees minimum mechanical properties and tested performance characteristics, while each manufacturer’s data sheet explains how their specific electrode delivers them. Same code, same baseline, different arc flavor within that envelope.
Classification matters most when the work is regulated. AWS D1.1/D1.1M, the structural welding code for steel, doesn’t list electrode brands — it references filler metal classifications directly. A bridge, a building column, a pressure-bearing assembly: the engineer specifies a classification, the fabricator buys to that classification, and the inspector certifies against it. When everyone reads the same code, the chain from drawing to finished weld stays intact.
That’s also why the supplemental designators discussed later (like H4 or H8 diffusible hydrogen limits) carry real weight. Higher-strength and restrained joints demand stricter hydrogen control, and the classification system is how those requirements get communicated without ambiguity. Lincoln’s sister resource on electrode classification covers how these suffixes plug into the base code.
Note: Manufacturer names and marketing terms (“premium,” “jet rod,” “hi-low”) are not part of the AWS system. Only the alphanumeric classification tells you what the electrode is qualified to do.
Once you see the code as a shared, legally referenced language rather than random numbers, the next step — reading the digits themselves — becomes straightforward.
Pick up a five-pound box of stick electrodes and you’ll notice a short code stamped on every rod: E7018, E6010, E6013. That string is a compressed specification sheet. It tells you how strong the weld metal will be, which positions you may weld in, what the coating contains, and which polarity the arc wants. Learn it once and you’ll never guess at a rod again.
The American Welding Society built this system so a welder in Ohio, an inspector in Texas, and an engineer writing a procedure in Canada all reach the same conclusion from four or five characters. The full rules live in AWS A5.1/A5.1M, Specification for Carbon Steel Electrodes for Shielded Metal Arc Welding, the standard behind nearly every mild-steel stick rod you’ll buy. If you’re new to consumables, our guide on what electrodes in welding actually are covers the wider family first.
Take E7018 apart and you get four distinct pieces of information, read from left to right.
| Part | Example | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Prefix | E | Electrode for arc welding by the SMAW (stick) process. A TIG rod or MIG wire starts with ER instead. |
| First two digits | 70 | Minimum tensile strength of the all-weld-metal deposit, in thousands of psi. 70 = 70,000 psi (about 480 MPa). |
| Third digit | 1 | Welding position or positions the electrode is qualified for. |
| Fourth digit | 8 | Coating type, usable current (AC, DCEP, DCEN), penetration, and bead contour. |
So E7018 reads: an electrode, depositing weld metal with a minimum tensile strength of 70,000 psi, qualified in all positions, with the coating and current characteristics designated by the number 8. That’s the whole trick.
The strength figure is a minimum, measured on a machined specimen cut from an all-weld-metal deposit. It is not a rating for the base plate or the finished joint. The common mild-steel values:
Note the phrasing: 70 means at least 70,000 psi, not exactly 70,000 psi. Certified values typically run higher. Metric designations in A5.1M follow the same idea in megapascals, so E4918 is the metric equivalent of E7018. And a 70,000 psi filler does not automatically make a joint that strong: dilution, heat input, and weld size all change the final result.
Quick Note: The strength digits say nothing about rod diameter, amperage, or gas. A 1/8-inch E7018 and a 5/32-inch E7018 share the same code but want completely different heat. Check the manufacturer’s range before striking an arc — our 3/32 E7018 amperage and polarity guide walks through realistic settings for the smaller sizes.
The third digit in a four-digit code (the fourth digit in a five-digit code) is the position rating, and misreading it is one of the most common field mistakes.
A “1” rating means the rod is tested and qualified for every position, not that it welds comfortably in all of them. Running E7018 overhead is legal but demanding; if that’s your task, our overhead stick welding guide for 4F and 4G work covers rod size, amperage reduction, and technique. Pipe work adds the same logic, where position and pass sequencing drive the procedure — see our pipe welding procedures guide for how the position rating fits into a written WPS.
The last digit tells you what’s wrapped around the core wire and, by extension, how the arc behaves. The coating determines shielding, penetration depth, slag behavior, and which current the machine must put out.
| Code | Coating family | Typical current | Arc character |
|---|---|---|---|
| E6010 | High cellulose sodium | DCEP only | Deep, forceful penetration; fast-freezing puddle |
| E6011 | High cellulose potassium | AC or DCEP | Like the 6010, slightly softer arc on AC |
| E6012 | Titanium rutile | DCEN, DCEP or AC | Moderate penetration, smooth bead, easy to strike |
| E6013 | Titanium rutile, softer | AC, DCEP or DCEN | Shallow penetration, forgiving arc for beginners |
| E7014 | Iron powder rutile | AC, DCEP or DCEN | Fast deposition, light slag, moderate penetration |
| E7024 | High iron powder | AC or DCEP | Very high deposition, flat wide bead, low penetration |
| E7018 | Low hydrogen iron powder | DCEP or AC | Smooth, quiet arc; clean bead; excellent mechanical properties |
Two clarifications. First, that final digit is a classification key, not a brand recipe — the exact iron powder percentage, slag chemistry, and trace elements differ between manufacturers. Second, it doesn’t tell you polarity alone; the certification always lists the permitted currents, and running a rod on the wrong polarity produces undercut, porosity, or spatter that has nothing to do with your hand skill. Lincoln Electric’s AWS classification reference and Miller’s common-electrode Q&A are solid places to confirm those tables against your specific rod.
Five-digit designations work exactly the same way, only the strength block expands from two digits to three. In E10018, the first three characters are the strength — 100 means 100,000 psi minimum tensile strength — the next digit, 1, is the position rating, and the final 8 again signals a low-hydrogen iron-powder coating. In E7048, the 70 is tensile strength, the 4 is the position (flat, horizontal, vertical-down, overhead), and the 8 is the coating. Suffixes such as H4, H8, R, -1, MR, or alloy designators like -A1 and -B2 can hang off the end, modifying the base classification; the core code still reads the same.
Do that consistently and a code like E7018 stops being alphabet soup and becomes exactly what the AWS intended: a five-character answer to the question “is this the right rod for this joint, this position, and this service?”
With the AWS classification broken down, the next step is applying it to the rods you’ll actually use. While there’s a vast selection of electrodes, a handful of stick rods cover the majority of day-to-day welding. Here’s a look at the most widely used codes, their arc characteristics, penetration, usability, typical applications, and DC/AC compatibility.
Quick Note: All of the classifications listed below fall under the AWS A5.1/A5.1M specification for carbon steel shielded metal arc welding electrodes.
The E6010 electrode is known for its aggressive arc and impressive digging power. With its cellulose sodium coating, it runs strictly DC+ (Direct Current Electrode Positive). Its light slag and forceful arc allow it to cut through mill scale, light rust, and other surface contaminants with ease.
Often called the AC counterpart to E6010, E6011 uses a cellulose potassium coating. This allows it to run on AC power sources while still providing the same deep penetration. It’s a staple for maintenance crews who may not have access to a DC-only machine.
Unlike cellulose rods, E6012 features a rutile-based coating. This creates a softer arc with heavier slag, allowing for solid coverage over less-than-perfect surfaces. As noted by Hobart Brothers’ electrode classification breakdown, rutile coatings promote arc stability and ease of use for general purpose welding.
E6013 is also rutile-coated, but it produces an even finer, cleaner arc than E6012. Its light slag is easy to remove, leaving aesthetically pleasing beads. It’s often recommended when learning fundamentals like travel angle welding or working with thinner materials.
E7014 contains a high amount of iron powder in its rutile coating. This increases deposition rates, laying down more filler metal per pass. As noted by Lincoln Electric’s AWS classification guide, iron powder electrodes drastically increase productivity without sacrificing arc stability.
Designed for flat and horizontal positions (indicated by the “2”), E7024 is loaded with even more iron powder than E7014. This creates a drag-style puddle with an extremely high deposition rate, making it ideal for large weldments.
Arguably the most critical rod for code-compliant work, E7018 is a low hydrogen iron powder electrode. Its coating drastically reduces the risk of hydrogen-induced cracking, so proper storage and polarity are crucial. For specific diameter settings, check out our guides on 3/32 E7018 amperage and 5/32 E7018 amperage.
Short Note: While these electrodes are incredibly versatile, always verify the exact classification and operating parameters with your electrode’s manufacturer. For structural code work, refer to the latest AWS D1.1/D1.1M requirements.
| Electrode | Coating Type | Penetration | Polarity | Best Used For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E6010 | Cellulose Sodium | Deep | DC+ | Pipe Roots & Dirty Steel |
| E6011 | Cellulose Potassium | Deep | AC, DC+, DC- | Field Repairs |
| E6012 | Rutile | Shallow-Medium | AC, DC- | Sheet Metal & General Work |
| E6013 | Rutile | Light-Medium | AC, DC+, DC- | Beginner Friendly Welds |
| E7014 | Rutile-Iron Powder | Medium | AC, DC+, DC- | High Deposition Fillets |
| E7024 | Rutile-Iron Powder | Medium-Shallow | AC, DC+, DC- | Flat & Horizontal Production |
| E7018 | Low Hydrogen-Iron Powder | Medium | DC+ (AC Available) | Critical Code Work |
If you’ve ever pulled a classified electrode like E7018 out of a rod oven and seen extra characters printed on the carton, you’ve stumbled onto the part of the code most beginners ignore and most inspectors care about most. Those supplemental designators tell you how much hydrogen the electrode can introduce into the weld, how it behaves in damp conditions, and whether it carries a toughness bonus. Once you can read them, you’ve moved from guessing to specifying.
Hydrogen-induced cracking, also called cold cracking, is the enemy of critical welds. It forms after the weld has cooled, sometimes hours later, and it’s driven by three ingredients working together: hydrogen in the metal, a hard susceptible microstructure, and residual stress. The coating on a stick electrode is the primary source of that hydrogen. Cellulose and other organic binders release moisture when heated, and that moisture dissociates into atomic hydrogen that dissolves into the puddle.
Low hydrogen electrodes solve this by using a calcium carbonate and calcium fluoride based covering with very little moisture. The Hobart Brothers electrode classification guide explains that these coverings are formulated specifically to keep diffusible hydrogen low. The E7018 family is the classic example: an iron powder, low hydrogen electrode that produces clean, slag-covered welds with very low hydrogen pickup when handled correctly.
Quick Note: Low hydrogen doesn’t mean zero hydrogen. It means the electrode is engineered and handled so the diffusible hydrogen level stays below a stated limit. Handle it poorly and a low hydrogen rod becomes a high hydrogen rod faster than you’d think.
The AWS A5.1/A5.1M specification for carbon steel SMAW electrodes defines the optional suffixes that follow the basic classification. Here are the ones you’ll see most often:
| Designator | Meaning |
|---|---|
| H4, H8, H16 | Maximum diffusible hydrogen in milliliters per 100 grams of deposited metal (4, 8, or 16 ml/100g) |
| R | Moisture resistant covering for high humidity or outdoor conditions |
| -1 | Supplementary toughness requirements, impact tested at lower temperatures |
| MR | Moisture resistant, a newer combined designation on some classifications |
So E7018-H4 is an E7018 limited to 4 ml of diffusible hydrogen per 100 grams of deposit, while E7018-H8 allows 8 ml. Lower numbers mean tighter hydrogen control and are typically demanded for heavy restraint, thick sections, or where the AWS D1.1 structural welding code restricts hydrogen for prequalified joints. The -1 suffix matters in cold climates and impact-rated structures, where the base metal and weld must both survive low-temperature service without brittle fracture.
This is where most hydrogen problems actually start. A sealed low hydrogen rod is fine. Open the box, leave it on a damp truck bed overnight, and the covering begins absorbing moisture from the air. The Lincoln Electric AWS classification reference notes that reconditioning temperatures and holding times are specified by the manufacturer and the governing code, commonly around 250–450°C depending on electrode type, followed by holding at a lower temperature until use.
Practical rules that keep your H4 rating honest:
For a real-world sense of how much amperage and handling affect performance, see our 3/32 E7018 amperage, polarity and running guide and the companion 5/32 E7018 settings guide.
Note: E6010 and E6013 electrodes are not low hydrogen types. Their cellulose and rutile coverings generate hydrogen by design. If your procedure calls for E7018, substituting a 6013 “because it runs easier” is a code violation waiting to happen.
Any joint with high restraint and no preheat is a candidate: thick plate, cold weather, rework on existing structures, and especially pipeline and pressure work, as covered in our pipe welding procedures guide. Overhead positions add another layer, since bead profile and rod handling change the equation; our overhead stick welding guide walks through rod selection for 4F and 4G work.
For beginners wondering why their practice beads cracked, our honest beginner’s guide to stick welding and the broader electrodes explained article dig deeper into rod choice and polarity.
The Miller Welds stick electrode FAQ sums it up well: classification tells you what an electrode can do, but storage and handling decide what it actually does in your hands. Read the suffix, respect the oven, and the code on the box delivers exactly what it promises.
Everything we’ve covered so far refers to stick welding, or SMAW, where a coated consumable electrode does triple duty as filler, flux, and current carrier. But “electrode code meaning” is a search that pulls readers into other processes too, because the word electrode means something slightly different in GMAW, GTAW, and SAW. If you’ve ever grabbed a spool of wire and stared at ER70S-6 wondering how it relates to E7018, this section will clear up the confusion. The good news: once you understand the SMAW code system, the wire classifications follow almost the same logic.
GMAW (MIG) solid wires and GTAW (TIG) filler rods are classified under a different AWS standard than stick electrodes, but the coding philosophy is familiar. Instead of a bare E for “electrode,” these consumables carry an ER prefix, which simply means the product can serve as either an Electrode or a Rod depending on the process. A GMAW wire feeds through the machine and acts as an electrode; the same alloy cut into straight lengths becomes a TIG rod. The designation ER70S-6 tells you, in order: minimum tensile strength of 70,000 psi, solid wire (S), and a specific deoxidizer chemistry (6). The governing specification for these carbon steel GMAW wires is AWS A5.18/A5.18M, recently updated with expanded metal-cored and gas-shielded flux-cored classifications in AWS A5.36.
Compare that to a stick electrode: E7018 means 70,000 psi tensile strength, all-position capability, and a low-hydrogen coating. ER70S-6 carries the same 70-series strength family, which is no coincidence. AWS deliberately keeps strength groupings consistent so a welder moving between processes understands what the filler metal will deliver.
Quick Note: If you’re setting up a MIG machine for the first time, wire classification is only half the equation. Our How to Set Up a MIG Welder: Complete Step-by-Step Guide walks through gas flow, polarity, and tension settings that make the code on the spool actually perform as promised.
Once you leave carbon steel, the codes shift from strength numbers to composition numbers. Stainless steel filler metals are classified under AWS A5.9/A5.9M, and the designations look completely different. ER308L tells you it’s an electrode/rod (ER), the base alloy family is 308 stainless (an 18-chromium, 8-nickel austenitic grade), and the “L” means low carbon for better corrosion resistance in welded joints. An ER309L contains more chromium and nickel because it’s designed for joining dissimilar metals, such as carbon steel to stainless. There’s no tensile strength digit or position digit here; the alloy chemistry is the classification.
That’s the single most important conceptual difference. Stick and MIG carbon steel codes lead with strength. Stainless and nickel filler codes lead with metallurgy. If a WPS calls for ER308L and someone substitutes ER308 without the L, they’ve changed the carbon content and potentially the corrosion performance of the entire joint, even though the base alloy “looks” the same. For a deeper dive into the process side, our complete guide to TIG welding sheet metal covers rod selection, settings, and the common mistakes that show up in thin stainless work.
Submerged arc welding adds another wrinkle. In SAW, the “electrode” is a bare wire, and the flux that blankets the arc is classified as a separate but matched component. You’ll see designations like EH14 or EL12 for the wire, where the E again means electrode and the H or L designates high or low manganese content. The flux carries its own code, such as F7A2, which describes diffusible hydrogen level and absorbed moisture. AWS A5.17 governs SAW wires and fluxes. SAW parameters are governed by WPS qualifications for heavy plate, pressure vessels, and structural fabrication.
Misreading a code across processes is a real, documented source of rework. A welder who assumes “70 means the same everywhere” and swaps an E7018 stick electrode’s requirements onto a gas-shielded wire will get the wrong gas, wrong polarity, or wrong parameter range. The codes are designed to prevent exactly that kind of guessing.
Every one of these consumables has a corresponding manufacturer data sheet that lists minimum tensile strength, applicable welding positions, recommended polarity, and shielding gas. If the code on the box is the shorthand, the data sheet is the full sentence. Cross-reference both before you strike an arc, and you’ll never have to guess whether “70” or “308” was the number that mattered for the joint in front of you.
Decoding a code like E7018 is only half the job. The harder skill is matching what that code promises to the joint actually sitting in front of you. Selection is really a five-way matching game: base metal, joint design, welding position, available current, and the service the weld has to survive. Get one variable wrong and the numbers printed on the wrapper stop meaning anything.
Every welder has a “go-to” rod, but the base metal should make the decision. The guiding rule is simple: filler strength should meet or slightly exceed the strength of the metal being joined, and the deposited chemistry must be compatible with it. Welding 50 ksi A36 structural steel with a 7018 gives you comfortable overmatching. Trying to fill a heavily loaded 70 ksi joint with nothing but 60xx electrodes leaves you undermatched, even if the bead looks perfect. Compositional compatibility matters just as much as strength, which is why stainless, cast iron, coated, and alloy steels each need a deliberately chosen filler family rather than whatever is in the nearest drawer. Our guide on what electrodes are in welding walks through those categories in more depth.
Quick Note: Never assume a higher-classified electrode is automatically “better.” A 7018 on thin, dirty sheet metal can cause cracking, porosity, and burn-through where a 6013 would have been ideal. Higher strength only helps when the rest of the joint can support it.
Material thickness drives amperage, which drives rod diameter, which drives electrode choice. On sheet metal and clean, fit-up-friendly surfaces, E6013 is the frequent answer: its smooth, quiet arc, moderate penetration, and easy slag peel make it forgiving on material that blows through easily. It also runs happily on AC, which is handy on basic machines and on sites with unreliable power. Detailed settings for that scenario live in our stick welding sheet metal walkthrough, with broader thin-metal amp settings and burn-through fixes covered separately.
On heavy plate, the priority flips from heat control to penetration and deposition rate. A deep-digit rod like E6010 or E6011 burns through mill scale and root gaps, while E7018 builds clean, dense layers of weld metal quickly on a prepared joint.
| Code | Penetration | Arc Character | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|
| E6010 | Deep, digging | Forceful, fast-freeze, DCEN only | Root passes, open gaps, out-of-position, rusty or scaled plate |
| E6013 | Moderate to shallow | Smooth, quiet, low spatter | Sheet metal, cosmetic beads, beginners, AC machines, light repair |
| E7018 | Medium | Soft, stable, low spatter, low hydrogen | Structural fill and cap passes, code work, positions 1–4 |
The classic field pairing is a 6010 or 6011 root and hot pass with 7018 fill and cover: penetration where you need it, toughness and cleanliness where it counts. 6010 also rewards a drag technique, since its forceful arc directs flux behind the puddle — we break down that choice in push or pull stick welding. For current settings on the popular 3/32 rod, see our 3/32 E7018 amperage and polarity guide.
The third digit is a hard constraint, not a suggestion. An electrode rated “1” handles all positions; a “2” is flat and horizontal only. Overhead work narrows rod selection fast, because puddle control and fast-freeze characteristics dominate — details we cover in overhead stick welding. Pipe and pressure work adds WPS-defined passes, purge requirements, and inspection criteria, which is why pipe welding procedures rarely leave electrode choice to the operator’s preference.
Service conditions matter too. Parts that see vibration, impact, low temperatures, or restrained joints benefit from low-hydrogen 7018 and controlled storage. Hardened or heat-treated steels may demand preheat and a specific filler rather than a general-purpose rod.
On code work, personal preference ends where the standard begins. The classification requirements themselves come from AWS A5.1/A5.1M, while AWS D1.1/D1.1M Tables 3.1 and 3.2 restrict which stick electrodes are permitted for a given weld type, thickness, and welding position. Before buying, confirm the classification on the manufacturer’s certification and data sheet — Lincoln Electric’s AWS classification reference, Hobart Brothers’ electrode classification article, and Miller’s common electrode answers are all reliable starting points.
Note: If a WPS specifies E7018, substituting an E7010 root “just because it’s easier” is a nonconformance. Electrode changes require engineer approval and, in most cases, revised qualification paperwork.
When working with Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW), knowing how to decode an electrode is only half of the battle. Even the most experienced welders can run into issues if the code is misinterpreted or the rod is mishandled. Below, we will break down the most frequent errors, misconceptions, and actionable fixes to prevent rework and ensure a sound weld.
One of the first hurdles that many beginners face is assuming that all similarly numbered electrodes are interchangeable. For example, while E6010 and E6011 share the same first two digits, their usability drastically differs. E6010 is DC-only; using AC causes instability despite similar numbering to E6011, which was designed to run on both polarities.
Solution: Always double-check the classification before striking an arc. If you are still learning the fundamentals, take a look at What Are Electrodes in Welding? Types, Numbers, Polarity & How to Choose to brush up on the meaning behind each digit. For compliance, verify against the requirements laid out in AWS A5.1/A5.1M.
Polarity is just as important as the electrode itself. Selecting the incorrect current can ruin an otherwise perfect bead, causing porosity, lack of fusion, or excessive spatter. This is especially true for out-of-position work, where precision matters the most.
Solution: Reference manufacturer charts for your specific rod diameter. For common sizes, resources such as 3/32 E7018 Amperage: Settings, Polarity & How to Run It and 5/32 E7018 Amperage: Settings, Polarity & Technique can help dial in your settings. For those new to the craft, Is Stick Welding Hard? An Honest Beginner’s Guide breaks these concepts down in an easy-to-understand manner.
One of the costliest mistakes in critical welding is mishandling low hydrogen electrodes. Improper electrode handling can degrade low hydrogen performance even if the code matches. Moisture absorption drastically increases diffusible hydrogen, which can lead to cracking in high restraint joints.
Solution: Store low hydrogen rods in a heated, sealed rod oven, only removing what you will use in a short time. Never leave them exposed to humidity for extended periods. These precautions are heavily enforced under AWS D1.1/D1.1M for structural work, as noted by Lincoln Electric.
A very common misconception is that any rod labeled 7018 will meet the same toughness or hydrogen requirements. This could not be further from the truth. Not all ‘7018’ electrodes have the same H-designators or toughness; always verify classification requirements for your specific procedure.
Solution: Pay attention to supplemental designators (H4, H8, R, MR, -1) on the electrode and cross-check them against your WPS. For code-heavy jobs, such as those covered in Pipe Welding Procedures: The Complete Guide to WPS, Positions, Passes & Inspection, this step is non-negotiable.
Quick Note: If you are welding high strength materials, a small oversight with designators can be catastrophic. Consult MillerWelds or your rod’s mill test report before proceeding.
The third digit of an SMAW code denotes its welding positions. Misunderstanding this can lead to dangerous defects, especially in overhead or vertical applications. Trying to force a flat-position rod into a tight 4F joint is a recipe for undercut and lack of control.
Solution: Familiarize yourself with position ratings before selecting a rod. For overhead work, Overhead Stick Welding: The Complete Guide to 4F & 4G Technique, Amperage, and Rod Selection is a great starting point. Additionally, utilize the troubleshooting advice found in Welding Defects Undercut: Causes, Acceptance Limits, and How to Fix It to spot red flags early on.
Short Note: A minute spent verifying your electrode code can save hours of inspection failure. When in doubt, consult your WPS and the manufacturer’s data sheet before you strike an arc.
Knowing how to decode the numbers on a stick electrode only gets you halfway. The other half is proving that the rod in your hand actually meets the classification printed on the box. On a code-governed job, “it says E7018” is not an argument an inspector will accept. Paperwork is. This is where specifications, certificates, and manufacturer data sheets come in, and understanding them separates a welder who gets passed over from one who gets trusted with critical work.
For carbon steel stick electrodes, the governing specification is AWS A5.1/A5.1M, Specification for Carbon Steel Electrodes for Shielded Metal Arc Welding. This is the document that defines what E6010, E6013, E7018, and the rest of the family actually mean. It sets the required minimum tensile strength, the accepted welding positions, the amount of diffusible hydrogen for low hydrogen designators, and the chemical composition limits for the deposited weld metal. Every manufacturer claiming an A5.1 classification is claiming compliance with that single, shared rulebook.
The second document is AWS D1.1/D1.1M, the Structural Welding Code — Steel. D1.1 does not invent electrode classifications; it references filler metal requirements and tells you which ones are acceptable for a given application, how they must be handled, and how the finished weld will be inspected. If you are welding structural steel in the United States, D1.1 is the code most likely sitting on the inspector’s clipboard. The same pattern shows up in other sectors: piping work follows its own procedure documents, and as our pipe welding procedures guide explains, the WPS always names the filler metal classification by its full AWS designation.
Verification is straightforward once you know where to look. Work through this checklist before a rod ever strikes an arc:
Quick Note: Classification standards get revised. A5.1 and D1.1 were both updated in 2025, so always confirm which edition your project specifies rather than assuming the older copy on the shop shelf is current.
Manufacturer resources are excellent secondary references for building practical understanding. Hobart Brothers’ electrode classification breakdown, Lincoln Electric’s AWS classifications page, and Miller’s common electrode Q&A are all written by engineers who publish under these same standards. Use them to interpret, but use AWS and your project’s governing code to decide.
Short Note: If a can of rod has no legible label, no specification reference, and no way to trace it to a lot, treat it as unverified. Scraps and re-bagged electrodes are a frequent source of mystery welds and failed inspections.
Every stick electrode carries a small printed code, but that code is anything but small in practice. As we’ve worked through this guide, the pattern has stayed consistent: the letter E simply tells you it’s a stick electrode, the first two digits give you minimum tensile strength in thousands of pounds per square inch, the third digit tells you which welding positions the rod will handle, and the final digit or digits describe the coating type, polarity requirements, and arc characteristics. Once you can read E7018 or E6010 at a glance, you’re no longer guessing at the outcome of your weld.
That’s the real payoff. Reading electrode codes unlocks predictable weld results because it lets you match the rod to the job’s actual demands: base metal thickness, joint position, service conditions, and the inspection standard the work has to satisfy. A structural foreman running pipe welding procedures doesn’t choose a filler by habit; the specification calls for a classification, and the code on the carton has to match it.
Quick Note: Before you strike an arc, check three things printed on the code: tensile strength, position rating, and current type. Get those right and most electrode-related weld problems disappear before they start.
Welders who understand classification make fewer errors, and fewer errors show up directly on the bottom line. Rework drops because the wrong rod is rarely loaded in the first place. Inspection pass rates climb because a required low hydrogen electrode actually gets used, and gets stored correctly, instead of a convenient substitute. Code compliance stops being a paperwork headache and becomes a byproduct of good habits.
Classifications aren’t static. Specifications are revised, hydrogen designators get refined, and manufacturer recommendations evolve with new coatings and wire processes. The authoritative reference remains AWS A5.1/A5.1M for carbon steel SMAW electrodes, with AWS D1.1/D1.1M governing structural welding. Manufacturer data sheets from companies like Lincoln Electric and Miller Welds translate those standards into amperage ranges, tack-weld advice, and storage guidance you can use at the bench.
Short Note: Treat every data sheet as required reading, not optional fine print. A five-minute check against Hobart Brothers’ electrode classification overview can save a rejected weld pass.
Put it together and the message is simple: a code is shorthand for performance. Learn the shorthand, verify it against the standard, store your consumables with care, and set your machine to match. Do that consistently and every weld you strike is safer, stronger, and ready for inspection.
The ‘E’ stands for electrode and indicates it is a covered electrode used for arc welding processes like SMAW. It tells you the filler metal is in rod form with flux coating.
The first two (or three) digits indicate the minimum tensile strength of the deposited weld metal in thousands of pounds per square inch (ksi). For example, 60 means 60,000 psi and 70 means 70,000 psi.
Position digit: ‘1’ means the electrode can be used in all positions (flat, horizontal, vertical, overhead); ‘2’ means flat and horizontal fillet welds only; ‘4’ indicates use in flat, horizontal, vertical down, and overhead positions for certain classifications.
Both are cellulose-based and provide deep penetration, but E6010 is designed for DC+ only, while E6011 is formulated with potassium to operate on AC as well as DC. This affects arc stability on different power sources.
E7018 has a low hydrogen iron powder coating that limits moisture pickup. Low hydrogen reduces the risk of hydrogen-induced cracking in high-strength steels, thick sections, or restrained joints.
No. SMAW uses E prefix (e.g., E7018). GMAW solid wires use ER prefix (e.g., ER70S-6 per AWS A5.18), and GTAW rods also use ER. While strength numbers are similar, classification systems and specifications differ by process.
Store low hydrogen electrodes in sealed containers or heated rod ovens as recommended by manufacturer and AWS. Exposed electrodes can absorb moisture, increasing diffusible hydrogen and risking cracking. Follow re-drying instructions if exposed.
Check the electrode label/markings, review the manufacturer’s certificate of conformance, and consult the applicable AWS specification (e.g., AWS A5.1 for SMAW). For code work, ensure it’s listed in project requirements like AWS D1.1.
E6013 is commonly used for clean sheet metal and general fabrication because it runs smoothly on AC, has easy-to-remove slag, and provides moderate penetration. E6011 is better for dirty/rusty material where deeper penetration is needed.
Suffixes are supplemental designators: H4 means maximum diffusible hydrogen of 4 ml/100g, R indicates moisture resistance, and -1 indicates improved impact toughness at lower temperatures. These refine the base classification for critical applications.